A political journal focusing on the ongoing struggle between hopeless liberalism and a new world conservative order that will free the masses and elect more Republicans to positions of trust and honor - or something along those lines.

Sunday, July 29, 2007

How Can We Fight Evil When We Allow It To Strike?

It is hard to fathom the courage it took for Dr. William Petit to appear Saturday at a memorial service in New Britain before hundreds of family members, friends neighbors and strangers eager to show their support for his unimaginable loss.

He has just laid to rest his entire family the day before, their lives ended by a spasm of violence that has no explanation or purpose. We all must pray for Dr. Petit as he seeks to recover and seek solace and support for months and years ahead. His father, Bill Petit, was a former member of the State Central Committee and a good friend of every Republican. His losses and pain cannot be measured.

Trying to make sense of what happened last week will take much time and most of it should be spent by doing what Dr. Petit urged in his moving tribute to his wife, Jennifer, his daughters Hayley and Michael.



"I guess if there is anything to be gained from the senseless deaths of my beautiful family, it's for us all to go forward with the inclination to live with a faith that embodies action, help a neighbor, fight for a cause, love your family." Live well, he told them. And, he said, "spread the work of these three wonderful women."

And while Dr. Petit's world has been changed forever, what do we learn from this incident which has unleashed emotions from shock and sorrow to outrage and vengeance?

Evil lurks amongst us constantly and often it rears its head in places that we think should be safe - a quite suburb, late a night, when the work of the day is over and the family reassembles to quietly assess the day and prepare for the next day of challenges.

Two miscreants, who have long strayed from acceptable norms of behavior and did not make any effort to amend their behaviors or start anew, selected the Petit family and struck savagely. Their mug shots show two people with blank stares of indifference, as if they were stopped mistakenly for driving with expired plates.

Somewhere in the byzantine workings of the Department of Correction are files, some incomplete, which were never properly evaluated or challenges when Steven Hayes, 44, and Joshua Komisarjevsky, 26, came through the revolving door of what passes for justice in Connecticut. Someone simply was either lazy, didn't care or took their eye off the file. Either way, those on the parole panel must have felt there was no price to pay for whisking these two back onto the streets without a warning and hoping for the best or simply believing no one would find out.

Somehow in our inert justice system someone who breaks into a home and violates the sanctity of that domicile is not a violent person. Somehow someone who has 26 arrests falls into a category that makes them eligible for early release, even after failing a drug test.

Someone sent me one statistic from the state that should make everyone think about buying a side arm. During the month that the two cons were paroled, 94 percent of those who applied for parole, received it.

And this is the same government structure, handcuffed by the Legislature, that makes it harder on gun owners to arm themselves than those who do harm. No wonder there were lines reported over the last week at Hoffman's Gun Store in Newington.

One can only wonder where the liberal Democrats like Judiciary Chairmen Mike Lawlor, D-East Haven and State Sen. Andrew McDonald, D-Stamford, will take us in the next legislative session. My guess is the Democrats will call for more education funding, more funding for job training for convicted felons, more funding for parolee intervention programs and more task force studies on the disparity of sentencing along racial lines. And of course, the Democrats will blame the disparity in incomes for these social problems. If we just had a millionaire's tax, then we could balance everything out and no one would be without.

Gov. Rell has rightly called for a top to bottom review of the entire parole system and supported the death penalty for the suspects if convicted on the felony murder counts. But the public has to wake up and start holding the liberal Democratic legislator's who got us here accountable. We are reaping the years of King Richard Tulisano's edicts on what is classified as a "mitigating" circumstance which prevents these type of cons from getting the needle. During Tuisano's years as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, it became altogether impossible for any deviant, long convicted and proven guilty even beyond DNA certainty of capital felonies, from being removed from the earth by lethal injection.

To them violent crime is a social failure based on low minimum wage, lack of affordable health care and racism.

Evil still lurks amongst us. What are we prepared to do about it?

5 Comments:

Blogger Judy Aron said...

Excellent Post Chris - Thank You.

7:48 PM

 
Blogger Phil said...

Have you no shame? You pretend to honor Dr. Petit with your comments about his courage, which is great indeed, but that is just a pretext for launching into a despicable polemic in which you essentially blame "liberal democrats" for this tragedy. Did a liberal Democratic Governor appoint a liberal Democratic legislator to be the head of the parole board that didn't do its homework when it approved parole for one of the future murderers without reviewing the court documents that painted a stark picture of the danger he posed to society? No, it was a conservative Republican Governor who appointed a conservative Republican legislator to head the agency that actually unlocked the prison door and released these two men back into my community. Incidentally, you owe your current party position to the same Governor.

But that is not the point. So what is the point? It is this: Two individuals tortured and murdered three fine members of our community and left a fourth to die. These men were on parole and were known repeat offenders. A thorough, non-partisan review of the process that released them, followed by swift corrective action, is in order. Gratuitous finger pointing and cheap shots at your political opponents is completely out of line.
I am sorry that I feel obliged to make these comments at all but your accusations must not go unchallenged.

9:31 AM

 
Blogger LisaRichards said...

IT’S ALL JUST RELATIVELY NIETZSCHE

BY LISA RICHARDS
July 28, 2007

The greatest danger to the western world is the perspective of relativism; it’s all just relative. The term has nothing to do with family relations; relativism translated simply means everyone and everything is meaningless, therefore there is no right or wrong, no accountability and no one to be held accountable to. That makes things relatively nice for criminals; they can rob rape and murder and never be responsible to higher authority or God, because God is relative; he does not exist unless the person chooses to believe God exists.

Out of relativism comes the entire belief system of liberalism.

Criminal action is nothing new, neither is the idea that one can get away with whatever one wants, but relativism was fostered to greatness in the nineteenth century by a German philosopher whose writings are said to be the main inspirations behind Hitler’s Nazism; Friedrich Nietzsche, a man who completely rejected the belief of God, embracing his ideas that “what we call truth is a mobile army of metaphors, metonyms, and anthropomorphimisms,” and what we believe to be “truth” is nothing more than an illusion we create in our mind to serve the purpose of our imagined belief that evil exists in the world and God can over come evil.

To Friedrich Nietzsche all human beings were weak with nothing more than the desire to “will the power” over other people. Nietzsche was a relativist and Freudian proto-type; he denied all absolute truths, including God; he claimed knowledge was nothing more than “useful fiction” created by the human mind to suit human needs; people believe whatever they want to believe, and what ever people see, people can perceive it the way they want. Nietzsche claimed God was nothing more than some imagined “idol” making human beings victims of “wishful thinking.” The doctrinal belief in God and following a religion based on him was completely unreasonable to Nietzsche who claimed God is nothing more than “the effect of what is believed true is mistaken for truth,” and believing in such a figment of the imagination is a psychological error that needed reevaluation for its value.

Friedrich Nietzsche’s philosophy is the concept behind relativism.

St. Thomas of Aquinas wrote: “And so it is evident that as to the general principles of reason, whether speculative or practical, there is a single standard of truth and right for everyone which is known by everyone. However when it comes to the specific conclusions of the speculative reason, the truth is the same for everyone but everyone does not equally know it.”

According to the relativist Nietzsche, Aquinas was essentially crazy; it is completely impossible for any human being to “observe outside” such a phenomenon as God, life, creation, etc.; God is simply relative psychology, and whatever we do is simply fine if it is what makes each individual happy.

Atheist enthusiast and Godless Jew Sigmund Freud agreed 100 percent with the anti-Semite German Nietzsche, claiming “the truth is the same for everyone,” and the belief in God is dangerous to the whole of mankind; God is nothing more than an “illusion” created in the mind of a child seeking a parent figure and a way to make good on all the bad things one does in life.

I’m surprised Hitler didn’t erect a statue in honor of the Godless, Atheist Jew loved by the anti-Semite who fostered Hitler’s Nazism.

Again, it’s all relative; do unto others as you wish, because they’re nothing but matter and don’t matter one, damn bit. Relativism is the concept that has been motivating violent criminals in America to commit the most heinous crimes, knowing all along they can commit these crimes, be imprisoned a short time, be paroled, recommit their crimes and be declared mentally insane because they had no understanding of their relative actions.

Thus we come to the latest relative act of nothingness.

On July 23, 2007, two 20-times convicted criminals broke into a Cheshire, Connecticut home and proceeded to torture, rape and murder an innocent family Manson-style. Why, because they could; because the actions were relative; because human beings are nothing more than matter and God does not exist to atone to on judgment day.

At 3 A.m., Joshua Komisarjevsky and Steven Hayes broke into the home of Dr. Petit and his family while the family slept. Waking Dr. and Mrs. Petit, the two men beat Dr. Petit with a baseball bat, tied him up and threw him down his basement steps; then the two men spent the night repeatedly raping Jennifer Hawke-Petit and her two daughters Michaela 17 and Hayley 11. In the morning on July 24, 2007, one man forced Jennifer to drive to the bank to withdraw $15,000 dollars, and then forced Jennifer to drive to a gas station for a container of gasoline.

Jennifer alerted a bank teller to the violence taking place and the teller phoned police. But it was too late. By the time police arrived, the Petit house was in flames, Dr. Petit was laying on his front lawn after managing to crawl out of the basement, Jennifer was found strangled inside the burning house, and her daughters were found tied to their beds where they died from smoke inhalation. The two men were caught as they tried to rush a police barricade.



The two monstrous freaks have been arraigned on charges of assault, sexual assault, burglary, kidnapping, robbery, larceny, and risk of injury to children, and are being held on 30 million dollars bail.

Police say the men could face the death penalty, but prosecutor Michael Dearington is not sure if that is the avenue he wishes to pursue even though “it’s public consensus to wish to fry these guys.”

I know a good avenue Mr. Dearington, the street the two non-human specimens committed their vile acts—the Petit’s street. Let the neighbors and relatives of the family have the criminals for one hour.

As for the death penalty, there will be many who decry this form of punishment as inhumane treatment which serves only to lower ourselves to the level of the criminal. I’m perfectly happy with lowering the switch on the electric chair. Death penalty opponents insist killing murderers does not prevent violent crime. If that’s true, why was there less crime in the 1950’s before liberal activist Supreme Court Judge Earle Warren released tens of thousands of violent criminals in America who went on heinous murder sprees which continue today?

Could God have been on to something when he said “Thou shalt not murder” because it’s wrong, and “an eye for an eye” must be dispensed to those who break laws, because justice must be enacted to “give unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s.”

The Connecticut Parole Board claims the Petit murder case is so shocking because it simply does not fit the mode of the two criminals who viciously murdered. The two men never raped and murdered before, according to the state of Connecticut, so why would repeated offenders suddenly decide to go on a killing spree.

Give me a freaking break; you don’t know why criminals suddenly decide to kill? Because they’re criminals and have no belief of right and wrong; they believe they can kill because life is worthless and human beings are nothing more than innate objects to use for obliging one’s means. And for the record, if someone has been arrested and imprisoned 20 times, the odds are that someone is going to up the ante the next committed crime.

The two non-human pieces of crap are Nietzsche proto-types. Everything those two men did to an innocent family was simply relative; it never actually happened unless people wish to perceive things as true. That is what Friedrich Nietzsche claimed, and that is why the world’s justice systems are so liberal—no one is doing wrong; wrong is in the eyes of the beholder; we’re all equal and must treat criminals as equal, humane beings deserving of respect we give all other; what you call deviance is wrong only to you unless of course you become the victim, then you’ll scream like a banshee for justice.

This too is how the Connecticut Parole Board views crime—its relative, just let the bastards go; they did their time; all people are fixable.

Connecticut’s justice system truly believed two freaks of Satan were rehabilitated because they spent the past year in a half-way house. How sweet. They reported to their parole officer weekly, they were nice to the parole officer, they bathed daily, combed their hair, brushed their teeth, flossed, wore deodorant, shaved, they even used hair product; they pet the neighbor’s kitty cat and waved to the Postman daily; they couldn’t possibly rape and murder horror movie-style.

If our justice system does not throw Nietzsche sociology and psychology down the toilet and replace it with God Almighty and his Ten Commandments, the violence perpetuating throughout America will continue on a downward spiral out of rejection of God and the indoctrinated religion of relativism. Without the belief and knowledge there truly is a God who holds us all accountable for right and wrong, humans will continue to look at others as illusions toward which we can do unto others as we so please.

How relatively Nietzsche.

copyright 2007 Lisa Richards
www.lisa-richards.com

11:26 AM

 
Blogger Old Biker said...

Rell is a conservative? When did that happen Phil? I'd think the Hartford Courant would have published this conversion with a call for her resignation. I used to be a Republican. Rell is just one of the reasons I'm not one of them any more. The Republican Party left me and took leave of it's senses. If there are any real Republicans in New England, please tell me where I might find the last dozen or so holdouts. I like visiting museums.

Besides that, I wish I could figure out what the rules are that created this buggered up parole system. Who exactly came up with the idea of making political hacks members of this board? That seems like taking a Jiffy Lube oil change tech and assigning him to the neurosurgery unit at Hartford Hospital.

Let's address that parole board membership qualifications first and worry about the finger pointing after the something has been accomplished. That in itself will probably take divine intervention since we seem to want to study things for decades or create commissions. Anything to avoid actually doing something. I fear this will turn out no different. The voters ultimately will decide, and I believe most voters will base their next choice on who promises the biggest check and not who promises to address crime & punishment issues.

11:00 AM

 
Blogger Laurel O'Keefe said...

to lisa richards..The men that committed these horrific acts are called SOCIOPATH
These morons couldnt even spell relativism let alone know or care what it means. They have no conscience none and for all intents and purposes that is what you seem to be suggesting that neitzches theory is all about-without saying this rather pointing bitter little fingers at "liberals" as the stanic influence causing all ills and crimes in our society
Will all of you please stop trying so hard to inject your own political biases and agendas into this HUMAN tragedy. If you truly felt for Dr Petit and the other family members who are grieving you would take that energy and use it to get something actually done-form a courtwatch group, an anti crime group draw up petititions write letters form a non profit for victims services...just get involved be part of the solution instead of just pointing fingers and doing nothing.

7:32 PM

 

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home